This is where the Kobo Glo HD’s screen sharpness comes in. You can make the text and margins as big or small as you like, and there are a bunch of fonts to choose from. More than you get with a Kindle, actually, if you’re totting up the pros and cons of siding with or against Amazon. Look deeper and you’ll find a shedload of ways to customise how the page looks too. While parts of the Kobo interface feel that bit sketchier and less smooth than the Kindle UI - page turns are a bit slower, for example - they’re remarkably similar in some respects.Īny ereader worth its salt puts the book you’re currently reading front and centre, so that 90 per cent of the time you don’t need to look anywhere apart from the home screen and the book you’re reading. The Kobo Glo HD gets very little wrong, but it simply lacks some of the things the Kindle range gets so, so right. This has been around for a couple of years now, but is still what you should be looking for (and is used by the top Kindles). As well as being high-res, it uses the latest generation of E Ink Carta screen. Kobo hasn’t scrimped anywhere on the screen, though. This is exactly why we still said the Paperwhite’s a solid choice in our Voyage review: it’s not a Kobo-specific slight. So a retina-grade screen is nice, not essential. So the image isn’t made up of millions of tiny pinpricks of light, and there are no obvious ‘gaps’ between pixels. They’re totally different to LCD and OLED screens, using black and white microcapsules rather than traditional lit pixels. The Kobo Glo and just about every other popular reader use E Ink screens. And looking pretty doesn’t matter quite so much when your brain’s the real canvas, not the screen. Why? First, you’re only going to be reading on the thing. Screen resolution is a bit less important here than it is in, say, a tablet. It is possible to put too much weight on this, though. ‘Sharp’ is good, especially if you like to cram more lines on the page than you get with your average paperback. It’s much sharper than a Kindle Paperwhite, for example. This is enough to make text appear perfectly crisp at the sort of distances you’ll be reading from. The 1448 x 1072 resolution screen gets you 300ppi density. It’s 6in across like the Kindles, but offers pretty incredible pixel density, for an ereader. I’m fine with it.īefore you get close to dismissing the Kobo Glo HD, just get a look at that screen. Whether that matters or not is up to you. It has a two- tone grey-and-black design, the rubbery rear being greyer, that is just not all that dazzling. Still, if being pretty is high on your list you might want to re-think the Kobo Glo HD. Does it really matter is it’s raised or not? Not really. I find a border a must-have in any ereader because you need somewhere to put your thumb. As a result it’s a bit chunkier than the Aura HD at 9.2mm thick. For example, the Aura-series Kobos have fully-flat screens where this one has a chunky lip just like the Kindle Paperwhite. We’re not talking so grippy you can lie in bed with one finger on its back and expect it not to slide onto your pillow, but sure enough it’s grippier than just about any other current ereader.Īlthough this is the latest Kobo ebook reader, and has all the latest tech, it’s not actually the highest-end model. I find it doesn’t quite feel as nice as the soft rear of the Kindle Paperwhite, but the idea is that it gets you a less slippy surface. The Kobo Glo HD is black and rectangular, its only notable bit being a dimply rubberised back, rather than the usual soft touch plastic one. Ereaders never look too flashy because, well, they’re just not meant to be are they? They help you hide you’re reading Dan Brown-grade trash on the train, not draw attention to it. So has Kobo gone all-out on the design? Absolutely not.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |